Having one’s back against the wall is not something we relish or wish upon ourselves. We feel anxious, concerned, fearful, and desperate. Yet, in extreme situations that require us to make decisions of survival, we bypass or shorten this state of tension and move towards one of ruthless clarity
Consider being in a situation of personal survival. Our instinctual response is to take action. We will focus with clarity on a single course of action to deliver a positive outcome. Our decisions are fast, decisive, and deliberate.
When faced with difficult personal and work decisions, why do we not always apply the same survival logic? It is not uncommon for flailing projects or organizations to adopt a scatter approach to problem-solving with delays and excessive deliberation. Where is the survival intentionality?
Challenging situations can bring clarity to the core of sustainability. A focused approach and decisive action inevitably bring favorable outcomes and reflects a level of ingenuity, resourcefulness, and cohesion, elevating teamwork. We hone in on the important.
If this approach works well when we have limited resources, why would we not select to adopt similar tactics in the best of times?
